This page explains how the content published on Globalnewsexpert.com is produced, what part artificial intelligence plays in it, and what we commit to so that you always know what you are reading.
Why this page exists
Since 2 August 2026, the European Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation EU 2024/1689) requires anyone publishing AI-generated text for the purpose of informing the public to say so clearly. We comply with that obligation, and we go slightly further: rather than doing the legal minimum, we would rather tell you plainly how this site is made.
How our articles are produced
Some of the articles published on Globalnewsexpert.com are written with the help of generative artificial intelligence tools. In practice, those tools assist with background research, structure, formatting and drafting, following editorial instructions set by the editorial team.
Every article concerned carries an explicit notice at the bottom of the page:
This article was written with the help of artificial intelligence.
The notice is applied automatically to every article published from 2 August 2026 onwards, the date the regulation came into application. Content published before that date falls outside the legal obligation and therefore does not carry the notice.
What artificial intelligence does not do
- It does not replace editorial judgement. Topics, angles and sections are decided by the editorial team, not by the machine.
- It does not pretend to be human. We do not operate any chatbot posing as a human correspondent.
- It is not used to fabricate statements. We do not publish content attributing to real people words they never said.
Images
Some illustrations on this site are generated by artificial intelligence tools. These are illustrative images: they do not depict real people, identifiable places or real events, and they are never presented as news photographs. Where an image shows a real scene, it comes from a photographic source, not from an image generator.
Should we ever publish an AI-generated image, audio or video depicting an existing person, place or event in a way that could pass for authentic, it would be disclosed clearly and visibly, as required by Article 50 of the European regulation.
Our commitments
- Transparency. You know, article by article, whether AI was involved in the writing.
- Correction. A factual error brought to our attention is checked and corrected, however the article was produced.
- No misleading content. We do not publish content designed to mislead readers about the nature, origin or authenticity of what they are reading.
- No personal data. The tools we use are not fed with our readers’ personal data.
The limits, stated plainly
A text produced with the help of AI can contain inaccuracies, outdated information or clumsy wording. That is true of text written by a human, and it remains true here. So please do what you would do with any source: cross-check anything important before acting on it, particularly where your health, your money or your rights are concerned. This page is not professional advice.
Reporting an error, contacting us
If a piece of content strikes you as inaccurate, incomplete, wrongly attributed or problematic in any way, write to us at [email protected]. We review reports and correct what needs correcting. Where possible, include the address of the page and the passage concerned — it speeds things up considerably.
Changes to this page
Both our practices and the regulatory framework evolve. This page is updated accordingly; the version you are reading is the one currently in force. It applies to the site globalnewsexpert.com.